The aim of scientific inquiry is to find the truth. Yet, some of the greatest scientific theories in the history of science are actually false (e.g. early models of the atom, Newtonian physics).
Closeness to the truth is a function of two factors
Thus, the more truths a theory entails, the closer it is to the truth.
Even two true theories can have differing degrees of verisimilitude, depending on how much true information they deliver. For example, the claim “it will be raining on Thursday next week,” if true, seems closer to the truth than the true yet logically weaker claim “it will either be raining next Thursday or it will be sunny”.
Similarly, the concept of a lie-to-children: creating a simplified world model to explain a system because the real one is too complex to grasp
Rejecting that the idea of certain facts are objective
For example, a verificationist about height would say that how tall you are depends on what evidence there is about how tall you are. The only height you can have is a height that in principle, discoverable or verifiable that you have
I its true from one’s perspective, its their truth → “If all my evidence says that there is a tall mountain there, then in my personal picture of the world there is a tall mountain there. That’s all it can mean, for me, to say that there’s a tall mountain there. The mountain really is there, for me, so long as it appears real, and fits my conception of a tall mountain.”